Home / Home

Hamilton Files Bill to Provide Insurance to Newborns

Oklahoma House of Representatives
Media Division
February 1, 2012

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Contact: State Rep. Rebecca Hamilton
Capitol:(405) 557-7397

Hamilton Files Bill to Provide Insurance to Newborns
Urges Pro-life Lawmakers to Support Measure

OKLAHOMA CITY– State Rep. Rebecca Hamilton has filed legislation to ensure Oklahoma families can once again obtain private insurance coverage for newborns, calling it one of the most important pro-life bills facing lawmakers this year.

The legislation would resolve problems created by recent Oklahoma Insurance Department rules that allow insurance companies to deny infant-only coverage for children younger than one year.

“Due to recent state-level regulations, if an unborn child is diagnosed with a terrible disability, the child’s family will be unable to obtain insurance coverage for the baby if they do not already have a family policy,” said Hamilton, D-Oklahoma City. “That leaves the family facing potential bankruptcy and pressures them to choose abortion. As a pro-life lawmaker, I believe state policy should encourage life, not incentivize its destruction.”

Under House Bill 2911, by Hamilton, any insurance provider “advertising, offering or selling a health insurance policy that covers only a child or children in the state shall offer the policy for any child under the age of 18 years. If the insurance provider does not offer or sell health insurance policies for children under the age of one year, the insurance provider shall not be allowed to advertise, offer or sell any insurance policies for children in the state.”

Other states, including Colorado and Arkansas, have passed similar legislation. In Colorado, where Republicans control the state House and Democrats control the state Senate, the bill passed easily with broad bipartisan support.

The Colorado bill was supported by insurance companies because it created a level playing field by ensuring all insurers would have to provide the policies (http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/print-edition/2011/01/21/Insurers-push-mandate-for-child-health.html).

Hamilton’s legislation would benefit an estimated 1,000 Oklahoma children who are not covered by family plans or Medicaid. In many instances, grandparents raising grandchildren are covered by Medicare, but cannot add their grandchildren to that program and are not eligible to enroll the children in Medicaid. In those cases, child-only policies have traditionally been obtained.

However, many insurance companies have dropped infant policies in the past year, a practice tacitly endorsed by the Oklahoma Insurance Department through a recent agency rule.

In light of industry support in Colorado, Hamilton said the Insurance Department’s actions are baffling.

“Sadly, what our state regulators have done is not pro-life or even ‘pro-choice,’ it’s flat-out pro-abortion due to the massive financial pressure it imposes on desperate families,” Hamilton said. “No one, not even the most ardent abortion advocate, would countenance doing a thing like this to Oklahoma families.”

The board of the Oklahoma High Risk Pool recently voted to provide coverage to newborns, but Hamilton noted that those policies are very expensive, costing about 150 percent of average premiums nationwide, making them unaffordable for many families.

She called on all pro-life lawmakers from both political parties to join her in support of the legislation.

“This is not a partisan issue,”Hamilton said. “It is about the lives and well-being of some of the most vulnerable citizens we were elected to protect: disabled children in their first year of life.”

-30-

10 comments (Add your own)

1. Doraemone wrote:
Wouldn't a whole of ppoele, basically including the candidates, Dem primary voters, all Democrats, all Republicans, and all independents (i.e., everyone) wonder what the charade known as the primary was all about these past few months if this happened?Wulsin calling it an interesting idea shows how weak a candidate she is. There's plenty of time, but she's got to figuratively grow a pair. Stand up for yourself, woman! You just worked your butt off for 4-6 months, beat four other candidates, and are one step away from the prize, and now walking away from it all is interesting ? (Say what you will about him, I don't Jim Parker would call the idea interesting. ) Second District voters could use a better demonstration of commitment make that any demonstration.

Tue, February 28, 2012 @ 3:00 AM

2. Jessica wrote:
Wouldn't a whole of poplee, basically including the candidates, Dem primary voters, all Democrats, all Republicans, and all independents (i.e., everyone) wonder what the charade known as the primary was all about these past few months if this happened?Wulsin calling it an interesting idea shows how weak a candidate she is. There's plenty of time, but she's got to figuratively grow a pair. Stand up for yourself, woman! You just worked your butt off for 4-6 months, beat four other candidates, and are one step away from the prize, and now walking away from it all is interesting ? (Say what you will about him, I don't Jim Parker would call the idea interesting. ) Second District voters could use a better demonstration of commitment make that any demonstration.

Thu, March 1, 2012 @ 1:21 PM

3. Manoj wrote:
to buy level term and ivsnet the difference in a better performing mutual fund. The insurance in the VUL is term, which can even be a decreasing term if the insured so pleases. (Why not buy the term insurance with tax-free income in the VUL policy!)I've never heard of a level term that lasts more than thirty years and the ivsnetment subaccounts have the same managers and ivsnetments as mutual funds! The biases against this tool come from people who have not accumulated much money, since they are unaware of the tax potholes people face from their qualified plans. Other biases come from people who write for WSJ or other media who probably failed as financial professionals. I understand the desire to hate insurance, but people need to ask themselves: between taxes and insurance, (since you have to pay for one or the other)why not pay for the one that is clearly cheaper over the long haul insurance.

Thu, March 1, 2012 @ 1:42 PM

4. Tina wrote:
Dont let Mr. Jeremy Hessel fool you.Have cealld and made complaints since 12-01-08 to no AVAIL with the hamilton county board of health Mr. Hessel's employer.They DO NOT come out and do a EXTENSIVE search no where in their process.I had a Luke Jacobs 513-946-7831 come to my apartment 2 months ago with a female trainee,who should her the infestation spot that is right in the living room and she grabed his back and covered her snicker as he smiled and acted macho in front of her.Very embarrising.When its I who am a victim here.I was not told the apartment was infested with bed bugs when I moved in or I would have ran like hell.And so would the others who have moved in here since I have.The board of health here in Cincinnati,Ohio puts up a good front but are FULL OF $__T!!!!!!Call and act like any citizen and I bet you wont get the good ole team spirit approach Mr. Hessel put on to you.You will be told All we can do is make them spray Exact words heard for the 10th time this morning.Dont let this city fool you it all sounds good but at the end of the day its the lower class who sit and suffer while the Mr.Hessel's of Hamilton County line their pockets with our little bit of cash we spend trying to get rid of these MAN EATERS!!!! The company that came to my place has been here 3 times since 09-01-09 to do what they call a treatment DELHI PEST CONTROL INC. BEING THE COMPANY are here for 10 minutes spraying roach spray on your baseboards and then making a hasty retreat after the precious ten minutes has elapsed.And this is REAL truth for those who want to be informed as I do.JOHN D. Cincinnati,Ohio

Thu, March 1, 2012 @ 6:59 PM

5. Prashant wrote:
Was Sarah Palin right after all, there are Death Panels, Arizona's Republicans rufsee care due to the expense?I guess some people might consider the panel set up by Far Right Wing Gov Jan Brewer to approve who gets transplants, a Death Panel. After all they are defining who will get the transplant on monetary grounds, just like the Palin so called Death camps. Some heart transplants are considered essential while others are put under the category of luxury, at least those were Brewers own words. She compared it to a Cadillac health benefit? The Goverment will make the decision not the doctors. Brewer pointed to the Insurance industry as her guide? Has the insurance companies suddenly become leaders in morality and ethics? Was Sarah Palin correct on something? Has America finally got it's own Death Panels under the Republicans in Arizona? +1Was this answer helpful?

Thu, March 1, 2012 @ 9:08 PM

6. Roberto wrote:
Yes you are assessed at what you pay. That is the true kmeart value, what someone is willing to pay for the house. Some counties do NOT adjust downward. the house sold for 300k 5 yrs ago, you get it for 250k they do not lower it. Call the Tax office for the municipality and ask.

Fri, March 2, 2012 @ 10:11 AM

7. Santhosh wrote:
Review by R. Densmore for Rating: Variable life is the next best thing to 401(k). This book explains why 85% of the Fortune 500 capomnies use this tax strategy to fund supplemental retirement plans for top executives. Clearly, one who believes buying term and investing the difference is smart has not built much of a pile of money, so doesn't understand what 1099 income does to their taxes. This book affirms my own actions. While I'd like to avoid the commissions, it is a worthy tradeoff the avoidance of confiscatory taxes on the growth and, later, on the income I will intentionally generate for retirement. My program functions like a tax free mutual fund, my agent is a CFP, and the overall package was well worth the few thousand of commission I paid. Compared to the unearned commission the IRS charges, this is a bargain for anyone with the intellect and logic to overcome age old biases and heresay. Thanks to this book, I like what I own even better now.

Fri, March 2, 2012 @ 11:53 AM

8. qhsbnfuaecm wrote:
5LpuWy elyigvcireoc

Sun, March 11, 2012 @ 5:05 AM

9. Tangie wrote:
Speaking from my personal and family experience only, I would say that Oklahoma State University in Oklahoma City (obviously in Oklahoma City, OK) is one of the best programs in the state (at least as far as 2 year programs go). After that, it would probably be the University of Oklahoma s Health Science Center in Oklahoma City, OK or Oklahoma State University s Health Science Center in Tulsa, OK.My mom was in the third graduating class at Oklahoma State University in Oklahoma City (OSU-OKC) which was an AS in Nursing. Several years later, she got into the University of Oklahoma s Health Science Center program to get her BS in Nursing.I m not sure if Oklahoma City University or the University of Central Oklahoma even have nursing programs, but Southern Nazarene University (in Bethany, OK) and Oklahoma Christian University in Edmond, OK may also have nursing programs because they are private colleges.As far as competition goes, I do know that you have to take at least one semester of regular classes at OSU-OKC before you can be accepted into their nursing program. But, on the same hand, if you have good scores and attendance and such, I never heard about many people being refused entirely from the program.Also, the advantage of going to a 2 year university and getting your RN as an Associates of Science means that you can go directly to work as an RN, then work your way through your Bachelors of Science while still earning a living from being an RN. Just a thought although I didn t go in to nursing, I did a similar thing when I was in college, getting my 2 year degree then working through getting my 4 year degree.I would suggest that you write, call, or email the nursing departments at the various school in the areas you might like to live and have them send you information on their programs. Most of the staff members are very helpful and more than willing to answer questions about their programs.Also, last but not least, Oklahoma is a relatively economical place to live so long as you have a car. We technically have a public transportation system, but it s much more of a joke than functional. As far as rent goes, you d be looking at between $350-500, depending on what kind of place you were willing to settle for. Of course, there ARE places more expensive than that, if that is your kind of thing.I ll include a couple of links for OSU-OKC s nursing program, as well as a link to the Daily Oklahoman s classified section so you can sort of browse cost of living issues.Hope that helps! Good luck to you!!!-mk

Sat, March 31, 2012 @ 2:48 AM

10. Francisco wrote:
Find your local agent from Yellow page,and make a call to them,they should have good suoggstiens for you.For the situation like yours,I would like to suggest you have a look here carinsurancefree.up4.net,you should find something useful.

Thu, May 17, 2012 @ 5:09 AM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.